Daqo New Energy (688303.SH): Strategic Production Cuts and Robust Balance Sheet Position Company for Cyclical Recovery

Date: September 23, 2025
Rating: Buy-B (Maintained)
Current Price: CNY 29.63 (as of Sep 18, 2025)
Analysts: Xiao Suo, Jia Huilin

Executive Summary

Daqo New Energy (688303.SH), a tier-one polysilicon manufacturer in China, has released its interim financial results for the first half of 2025 (1H25). The report reflects a period of intense industry consolidation, characterized by significant revenue contraction and net losses due to depressed polysilicon prices and strategic production adjustments. However, the company’s proactive management of supply through voluntary production cuts, coupled with an exceptionally strong balance sheet devoid of interest-bearing debt, positions it as a resilient survivor capable of navigating the current downcycle.

In 1H25, Daqo reported revenue of CNY 1.47 billion, a year-over-year (YoY) decline of 67.9%, and a net loss attributable to shareholders of CNY 1.15 billion. While the top-line contraction was severe, the second quarter (2Q25) showed signs of stabilization in profitability metrics, with the net loss narrowing to CNY 590 million, representing a 41.2% YoY improvement despite a sequential dip. This improvement underscores the efficacy of the company’s cost-control measures and operational refinement, even amidst reduced operating rates.

A critical development supporting the investment thesis is the regulatory shift in energy consumption standards for polysilicon production. Recent draft guidelines propose tightening energy efficiency requirements, which are expected to accelerate the exit of approximately 15% of existing high-cost, high-energy capacity (estimated at 520,000 tonnes/year). As a low-cost leader with advanced technological capabilities, Daqo is well-positioned to benefit from this supply-side clearance.

We maintain our "Buy-B" rating on Daqo New Energy. Our valuation model projects a turnaround in earnings starting in 2026, with estimated EPS of CNY -0.44 in 2025E, recovering to CNY 0.50 in 2026E and CNY 0.95 in 2027E. The company’s robust cash reserves (CNY 12.09 billion as of June 2025) provide a substantial safety margin, allowing it to withstand prolonged periods of negative margins while competitors face liquidity crises. We view the current valuation as an attractive entry point for long-term investors anticipating the eventual rebalancing of the polysilicon supply-demand dynamics.

Key Takeaways

1. Financial Performance: Navigating the Trough

The 1H25 financial results reflect the broader distress in the solar upstream sector, where polysilicon prices have fallen below the cash cost of many producers. Daqo’s performance, while negative in absolute profit terms, demonstrates relative strength in cost management and cash preservation.

Revenue and Profitability Analysis

• 1H25 Overview:

  • Revenue: CNY 1.47 billion, down 67.9% YoY.
  • Net Profit: Loss of CNY 1.15 billion.
  • Context: The sharp decline in revenue is primarily driven by the collapse in polysilicon selling prices and a deliberate reduction in sales volume to align with market demand and support price stability.

• 2Q25 Quarterly Breakdown:

  • Revenue: CNY 560 million, down 64.9% YoY and down 38.0% quarter-over-quarter (QoQ).
  • Net Profit: Loss of CNY 590 million.
  • Profit Trend: Although the loss widened slightly QoQ (-5.5%), the YoY comparison shows a significant 41.2% improvement in net profit performance. This indicates that the company is mitigating the impact of lower prices through rigorous cost control and operational efficiency, even as it reduces output.

*Note: 1H24 and 2Q24 figures derived from reported growth rates for contextual analysis.

Cost Structure and Efficiency

Despite the challenging environment, Daqo has maintained a competitive cost structure, although unit costs have risen due to lower utilization rates spreading fixed costs over fewer units.

• Unit Total Cost: In 1H25, the average total cost per kilogram of polysilicon was CNY 55.1/kg, an increase of 19.8% YoY. This rise is attributed to the decrease in operating rates and the resulting impact of fixed costs (labor, depreciation) on a smaller production base.
• Unit Cash Cost: Crucially, the cash cost per kilogram decreased by 6.6% YoY to CNY 37.7/kg. This metric is vital for assessing survival capability in a downturn. The reduction in cash costs highlights the effectiveness of Daqo’s refined operational management and its ability to optimize variable inputs despite lower throughput.
• Implication: The divergence between rising total costs and falling cash costs suggests that the company’s core operational efficiency remains intact. As utilization rates normalize in future periods, the total unit cost is expected to decline significantly, restoring margins.

2. Strategic Production Adjustments: Leading Industry Discipline

Daqo has actively participated in industry self-discipline initiatives, voluntarily adjusting its production and shipment rhythms to alleviate supply pressure and support market price stabilization. This strategic restraint distinguishes Daqo from competitors who may continue to produce at full capacity to maintain market share, thereby exacerbating the price war.

Production and Sales Volume Analysis

• 2Q25 Production: 26,000 tonnes.
  • YoY: -60.0%
  • QoQ: +4.8%
• 2Q25 Sales: 18,000 tonnes.
  • YoY: -57.9%
  • QoQ: -35.3%
• 1H25 Cumulative Production: 51,000 tonnes (-60.1% YoY).
• 1H25 Cumulative Sales: 46,000 tonnes (-52.5% YoY).

The significant year-over-year reductions in both production and sales volumes confirm the company’s commitment to supply-side discipline. The slight sequential increase in production in 2Q25 (+4.8%) alongside a drop in sales (-35.3%) suggests a cautious buildup of inventory or a timing mismatch, but overall, the volume trajectory remains constrained compared to historical peaks.

Future Production Guidance

Management has provided clear guidance for the remainder of 2025, signaling continued prudence:
* 3Q25E Production: 27,000 – 30,000 tonnes.
* Full Year 2025E Production: 110,000 – 130,000 tonnes.

This guidance implies a moderate increase in activity in the second half of the year compared to the first half, but still well below the company’s maximum capacity. This approach allows Daqo to remain flexible, ready to ramp up if demand surprises to the upside, while avoiding the creation of excess inventory that could further depress prices.

3. Fortress Balance Sheet: Liquidity as a Competitive Moat

In a capital-intensive industry undergoing a severe downturn, liquidity is the primary determinant of survival. Daqo New Energy stands out with an exceptionally robust financial position, characterized by massive cash reserves and zero interest-bearing debt.

Liquidity Position (as of June 30, 2025)

• Debt-Free Status: The absence of short-term or long-term borrowings eliminates interest expense pressures and refinancing risks. In an environment where credit conditions may tighten for loss-making solar firms, Daqo’s zero-debt status is a monumental advantage.
• Cash Burn Resilience: With CNY 12.09 billion in cash and liquid assets, Daqo can sustain operations through extended periods of negative cash flow without needing external financing. This financial firepower allows the company to:
  1. Continue R&D investments to maintain technological leadership.
  2. Potentially acquire distressed assets or competitors at favorable valuations during the consolidation phase.
  3. Wait out the cycle without being forced to sell product at unsustainable losses purely for cash flow generation.

Asset Quality and Solvency

• Current Ratio: The company maintains a healthy current ratio (projected at 6.5x for 2025E), indicating strong short-term solvency.
• Asset-Liability Ratio: At just 5.9% (2025E forecast), the leverage is negligible. This conservative capital structure provides immense flexibility for future strategic moves.

4. Industry Catalyst: Regulatory Tightening on Energy Consumption

A pivotal structural change is underway in the Chinese polysilicon industry, driven by new regulatory standards aimed at eliminating inefficient capacity. This "supply-side reform" is expected to accelerate the clearing of high-cost producers, benefiting low-cost leaders like Daqo.

New Energy Consumption Standards

On September 16, 2025, the National Public Service Platform for Standards Information released a draft for comment on new energy consumption standards for polysilicon production. The proposed standards are stricter than market expectations, particularly for lower-tier facilities.

• kgce/kg: Kilograms of coal equivalent per kilogram of polysilicon produced.

Impact on Industry Supply

According to data from Mysteel New Energy Photovoltaics, the implementation of these stricter standards is expected to have a profound impact on existing capacity:
* At-Risk Capacity: Approximately 15% of existing polysilicon capacity, equivalent to roughly 520,000 tonnes per year, may be unable to meet the new Grade 3 standard without significant technical retrofits.
* Exit or Integration: Facilities that cannot economically upgrade will likely be forced to exit the market or be integrated/acquired by more efficient players.
* Acceleration of Clearing: This regulatory push acts as a catalyst for the natural market clearing process. By raising the barrier to entry and operation, it reduces the likelihood of "zombie capacity" lingering in the market and dragging down prices indefinitely.

For Daqo, which operates modern, large-scale facilities with industry-leading energy efficiency, this regulatory shift is a net positive. It reduces competition from higher-cost marginal producers, paving the way for a healthier supply-demand balance and potential price recovery in the medium term.

5. Valuation and Earnings Forecast

We have updated our financial models to reflect the 1H25 results and the evolving industry landscape. Our forecasts incorporate the assumption of a gradual recovery in polysilicon prices starting in late 2025/early 2026, driven by the exit of high-cost capacity and steady demand growth in downstream solar installations.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Projections

• 2025E: We expect Daqo to remain in loss territory for the full year 2025, with an estimated EPS of -CNY 0.44. However, this represents a significant narrowing of losses compared to 2024 (-CNY 1.27), reflecting the impact of cost controls and partial price stabilization.
• 2026E: We project a return to profitability with an EPS of CNY 0.50. This turnaround is predicated on the successful exit of inefficient capacity (aided by new energy standards) and a modest recovery in polysilicon pricing to levels above the total cost of production for tier-1 players.
• 2027E: Earnings are expected to grow robustly to CNY 0.95 EPS, assuming a normalized market environment where supply and demand are better balanced, and Daqo captures a larger share of a healthier market.

Valuation Metrics

• Price-to-Earnings (P/E): Given the current losses, forward P/E ratios for 2025 are not meaningful. The 2026E P/E of 59.2x appears high but is typical for cyclical stocks emerging from a trough. The 2027E P/E of 30.9x offers a more reasonable valuation anchor for long-term growth.
• Price-to-Book (P/B): The stock trades at a P/B of approximately 1.6x (based on 2025E book value). For a asset-heavy manufacturing business with a pristine balance sheet and leading technology, this multiple provides a reasonable floor, considering the replacement cost of its high-quality assets.
• EV/EBITDA: The Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio is projected to improve from negative/distorted levels in 2024-2025 to 20.7x in 2026E and 14.7x in 2027E, aligning with historical averages for mature chemical/materials companies during normal cycles.

Risks / Headwinds

While the investment case for Daqo New Energy is supported by strong fundamentals and industry tailwinds, investors must consider several key risks that could impede the projected recovery or impact financial performance.

1. Industry Self-Discipline Execution Risk

• Risk Description: The current strategy relies heavily on industry-wide cooperation to limit production and stabilize prices. If major competitors fail to adhere to voluntary production cuts or engage in aggressive price wars to gain market share, the supply glut could persist longer than anticipated.
• Impact: Prolonged oversupply would keep polysilicon prices below cash costs for a wider range of producers, extending the duration of losses for Daqo and delaying the break-even point.
• Mitigation: Daqo’s low cash cost provides a buffer, but sustained price depression would erode cash reserves faster than modeled.

2. Downstream Demand Uncertainty

• Risk Description: The demand for polysilicon is derived from the installation of solar photovoltaic (PV) systems. Global PV demand is subject to macroeconomic conditions, interest rate environments, and policy changes in key markets (China, Europe, US, India).
• Specific Concerns:
  • Trade Barriers: Increased tariffs or non-tariff barriers in the US or Europe could restrict export opportunities for Chinese solar modules, indirectly reducing upstream polysilicon demand.
  • Grid Congestion: In key markets, grid infrastructure limitations may slow down the connection of new solar projects, leading to inventory buildups downstream that eventually feed back to upstream curtailments.
• Impact: Lower-than-expected downstream demand would necessitate further production cuts or lead to higher inventory levels, pressuring margins.

3. Raw Material and Energy Price Volatility

• Risk Description: Polysilicon production is energy-intensive and relies on specific raw materials (such as industrial silicon and chemicals). Fluctuations in electricity prices (especially in regions reliant on coal or hydro) and raw material costs can impact the cash cost structure.
• Impact: An unexpected spike in energy or raw material costs could widen the gap between selling prices and cash costs, worsening short-term losses. Conversely, Daqo’s location in Xinjiang (with access to low-cost coal-powered electricity) provides a structural advantage, but regulatory changes regarding carbon emissions or energy pricing could alter this dynamic.

4. Technological Disruption and Quality Standards

• Risk Description: The solar industry is rapidly evolving, with a shift towards N-type cells (TOPCon, HJT) that require higher-purity polysilicon (N-type grade). If Daqo fails to maintain its yield and quality consistency for N-type material, it could lose premium pricing power.
• Impact: Competitors who successfully ramp up high-quality N-type production could capture market share, forcing Daqo to sell more of its output as lower-margin P-type material.
• Mitigation: Daqo has historically been a leader in quality, but continuous R&D investment is required to stay ahead.

5. Safety and Environmental Compliance

• Risk Description: Chemical manufacturing carries inherent risks related to workplace safety and environmental compliance. Any significant accident or regulatory violation could lead to production shutdowns, fines, and reputational damage.
• Impact: Unplanned downtime would disrupt supply commitments and increase repair/remediation costs. Stricter environmental regulations could also necessitate additional capital expenditures for compliance.

6. Geopolitical and Trade Policy Risks

• Risk Description: As a Chinese company, Daqo is exposed to geopolitical tensions. Specifically, the U.S. Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) and similar initiatives in other Western countries create complexities for the solar supply chain.
• Impact: While Daqo primarily serves the domestic Chinese market and non-restricted export markets, any broadening of trade restrictions could limit its addressable market or complicate logistics for international customers using its material.

Rating / Sector Outlook

Sector Outlook: Consolidation and Rationalization

The global polysilicon sector is currently in the late stages of a severe downcycle. The combination of massive capacity expansion in 2023-2024 and subsequent price collapses has rendered a significant portion of industry capacity unprofitable.

• Supply Side: We are witnessing a critical turning point where financial stress is forcing high-cost producers to halt production or exit the market. The new energy consumption standards introduced by the Chinese government act as a powerful accelerant to this process. We expect the effective supply growth to slow significantly in 2025 and 2026 as outdated capacity is retired.
• Demand Side: Global solar installations continue to grow, driven by the energy transition and declining system costs. While growth rates may moderate from the explosive levels of previous years, the absolute volume of demand remains robust. This steady demand growth, against a shrinking or stagnant supply base, sets the stage for a supply-demand rebalancing.
• Price Trajectory: We anticipate polysilicon prices to bottom out in 2025. Prices may remain volatile in the near term but should trend upwards in 2026 as the market clears. The recovery will likely be gradual rather than V-shaped, as remaining players will be cautious about restarting idle capacity too quickly.

Company Rating: Buy-B (Maintained)

We maintain our Buy-B rating on Daqo New Energy.

• Rationale:

  1. Survivorship Bias: In a consolidation cycle, the strongest balance sheets win. Daqo’s CNY 12 billion cash reserve and zero debt status make it one of the most financially secure players in the industry. It has the endurance to outlast weaker competitors.
  2. Cost Leadership: Despite the rise in unit total costs due to low utilization, Daqo’s cash cost of CNY 37.7/kg remains among the lowest in the industry. This ensures that when prices recover, Daqo will be the first to return to profitability and generate substantial free cash flow.
  3. Regulatory Tailwind: The tightening of energy consumption standards directly benefits Daqo’s modern, efficient facilities while penalizing older, less efficient competitors. This structural change enhances Daqo’s long-term competitive moat.
  4. Valuation Appeal: At current levels, the stock prices in significant distress. However, the downside is limited by the company’s net cash position and asset value. The upside potential from the cyclical recovery in 2026-2027 offers an asymmetric risk-reward profile for long-term investors.

• Target Price Considerations: While a specific target price is not explicitly reiterated in this update, the implied valuation based on 2027E earnings (CNY 0.95 EPS) and a reasonable cyclical P/E multiple (e.g., 20-25x) suggests a fair value range significantly above the current price of CNY 29.63. Investors should view the current period as an accumulation phase ahead of the earnings recovery.

Investment View

Strategic Positioning for Institutional Investors

For institutional investors, Daqo New Energy represents a classic "contrarian" play within the renewable energy sector. The narrative has shifted from "growth at all costs" to "survival of the fittest." In this context, Daqo’s investment thesis rests on three pillars: Financial Resilience, Operational Efficiency, and Structural Industry Change.

1. The "Cash is King" Argument

In the current market environment, profitability metrics (P/E) are temporarily distorted by industry-wide losses. Therefore, traditional valuation multiples are less informative than balance sheet strength. Daqo’s enterprise value is effectively its market capitalization minus its net cash position.

• Market Cap: ~CNY 63.56 billion.
• Net Cash: ~CNY 12.09 billion.
• Implied Enterprise Value: ~CNY 51.47 billion.

Investors are essentially paying for the company’s productive assets (factories, technology, market position) at a discounted rate, with the cash pile providing a significant margin of safety. Unlike leveraged competitors who face existential threats from refinancing walls or covenant breaches, Daqo’s equity is not at risk of dilution or bankruptcy. This makes it a preferred vehicle for exposure to the polysilicon sector’s eventual recovery.

2. Operational Alpha Through Cycle Management

Daqo’s management has demonstrated superior capital allocation and operational discipline. The decision to voluntarily cut production in 1H25, despite the short-term impact on revenue, was a strategic move to support industry pricing. This contrasts with peers who may have prioritized volume over price, exacerbating their own losses and the industry’s downturn.

• Flexibility: Daqo’s ability to adjust production rates (as seen in the 2Q25 vs 1Q25 dynamics) allows it to respond dynamically to market signals.
• Cost Control: The reduction in cash costs to CNY 37.7/kg despite lower volumes is a testament to operational excellence. This metric is the key indicator of the company’s underlying health. As volumes ramp up in 2026, operating leverage will drive rapid margin expansion.

3. Beneficiary of Supply-Side Reform

The introduction of stricter energy consumption standards is a game-changer. It transforms the industry structure from a fragmented, hyper-competitive market into a more consolidated oligopoly dominated by efficient, large-scale players.

• Capacity Exit: The potential exit of 520,000 tonnes of high-cost capacity removes a significant overhang on the market.
• Pricing Power: As supply tightens, the remaining players, including Daqo, will regain pricing power. This will not necessarily lead to exorbitant profits (due to the threat of new entry), but it will restore sustainable returns on invested capital (ROIC).
• Long-Term Moat: Daqo’s existing facilities are already compliant with the highest standards. This means no major capex is required for compliance, whereas competitors face a choice between costly upgrades or exit. This widens Daqo’s cost advantage relative to the marginal producer.

4. Financial Forecast and Sensitivity

Our base case assumes a gradual recovery in polysilicon prices to a level that allows tier-1 producers to earn a modest return on capital by 2026.

• Base Case (2026E): EPS CNY 0.50. Assumes average selling prices recover to slightly above total cost (approx. CNY 60-70/kg range, depending on mix).
• Bull Case: If demand surprises to the upside or capacity exits faster than expected, prices could spike higher. In this scenario, 2026 EPS could exceed CNY 0.70, driving significant multiple expansion.
• Bear Case: If industry discipline fails and prices remain below cash cost for an extended period, losses could deepen. However, even in this scenario, Daqo’s cash runway is multi-year, reducing the risk of permanent capital impairment.

5. Conclusion

Daqo New Energy is well-positioned to emerge from the current solar downcycle as a stronger, more dominant player. The combination of a fortress balance sheet, industry-leading cost structure, and favorable regulatory tailwinds creates a compelling investment opportunity. While near-term volatility and losses are expected, the long-term trajectory points towards a robust recovery in earnings and cash flow generation.

We advise institutional investors to view the current weakness as a buying opportunity for long-term portfolios. The risk-reward profile is skewed positively, given the limited downside protected by cash assets and the significant upside potential from the inevitable cyclical upturn. Maintaining a Buy-B rating reflects our confidence in Daqo’s ability to navigate the storm and capitalize on the subsequent recovery.

Appendix: Detailed Financial Data & Assumptions

Historical and Projected Income Statement Highlights (CNY Million)

Balance Sheet Strength Indicators (CNY Million)

Cash Flow Analysis (CNY Million)

Note: The projected decline in cash balances in 2025E reflects the burn rate associated with operating losses and continued maintenance capex, though the absolute level remains very high.

Key Assumptions for Forecast Model

1. Polysilicon Pricing: We assume average selling prices (ASP) for polysilicon remain depressed in 2025, averaging below CNY 50/kg, before recovering to CNY 60-70/kg in 2026 and stabilizing in 2027.
2. Volume Growth: Sales volumes are assumed to follow the production guidance, with a modest recovery in 2H25 and stronger growth in 2026-2027 as demand absorbs the cleared supply.
3. Cost Stability: Cash costs are assumed to remain stable around CNY 35-40/kg, benefiting from operational efficiencies. Total unit costs will decrease as utilization rates rise.
4. Capex Discipline: Capital expenditures are expected to remain low, focused on maintenance and minor upgrades rather than significant expansion, preserving cash.
5. Taxation: Tax benefits from loss carryforwards are considered in the 2026-2027 projections, improving net margins.

Analyst Certification and Disclosure

Analyst Certification:
The analysts named in this report, Xiao Suo (S0760522030006) and Jia Huilin (S0760523070001), certify that they are registered with the Securities Association of China as securities analysts. They commit to issuing this report with a diligent professional attitude, independently and objectively. They take responsibility for the content and views of this securities research report, ensuring that the information sources are legal and compliant, the research methods are professional and prudent, and the analysis conclusions have a reasonable basis. This report clearly reflects the analysts' research views. The analysts have not received, do not receive, and will not receive any form of compensation directly or indirectly for the specific recommendations or views in this report. They commit not to use their identity, position, or information mastered during their practice to seek personal gain for themselves or others.

Investment Rating Explanation:
The investment ratings are based on the expected price performance of the company's stock (or industry index) relative to the benchmark index over the 6-12 months following the report's release.
* A-Share Benchmark: CSI 300 Index.
* Company Ratings:
* Buy: Expected outperformance of >15% relative to the benchmark.
* Outperform: Expected outperformance of 5%-15% relative to the benchmark.
* Neutral: Expected performance between -5% and +5% relative to the benchmark.
* Underperform: Expected underperformance of -5% to -15% relative to the benchmark.
* Sell: Expected underperformance of >15% relative to the benchmark.
* Industry Ratings:
* Outperform: Expected outperformance of >10% relative to the benchmark.
* In-line: Expected performance between -10% and +10% relative to the benchmark.
* Underperform: Expected underperformance of >10% relative to the benchmark.
* Risk Rating:
* A: Expected volatility less than or equal to the benchmark.
* B: Expected volatility greater than the benchmark.

Disclaimer:
Shanxi Securities Co., Ltd. (the "Company") possesses the qualification for securities investment consulting business. This report is based on information that the Company considers reliable and has been made public, but the Company does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information. Investing in the stock market involves risks; please invest with caution. Under no circumstances shall the information or opinions expressed in this report constitute investment advice to any person. The Company shall not be liable for any losses incurred by any person due to the use of any content in this report. The data, opinions, and estimates contained in this report reflect the judgment as of the date of publication. The Company may issue reports with inconsistent data, opinions, and estimates at different times. The Company or its affiliates may hold or trade the securities or investment targets mentioned in this report under legal permissions, and may provide or strive to provide investment banking or financial advisory services to these companies. Clients should be aware that the Company may have conflicts of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. The Company fulfills disclosure obligations within the scope of its knowledge. This report is copyrighted by the Company. The Company reserves all rights to this report. Without prior written authorization from the Company, no part of this report may be copied, reproduced, or distributed in any manner or form, or redistributed to any other person, or used in any other way that infringes on the Company's copyright. Otherwise, the Company reserves the right to pursue legal liability at any time.

Important Notice on Distribution:
In accordance with the "Code of Conduct for Publishing Securities Research Reports," employees of the Company are prohibited from privately providing Company securities research reports to any unauthorized media or institution. Any media or institution is prohibited from unauthorized private publication or forwarding of Company securities research reports. Authorization for publication or forwarding must be agreed upon through a signed agreement, clearly stating that the authorized institution bears the relevant responsibilities for publication or forwarding.

Clients of the Company's securities research business are hereby reminded not to forward Company securities research reports to others. Clients and public investors are advised to use securities research reports published in public media with caution.

In accordance with the "Provisions on Clean Practice of Securities and Futures Operating Institutions and Their Staff" and the "Implementation Rules for Clean Practice of Securities Operating Institutions and Their Staff," clients of the Company's securities research business are hereby informed to comply with clean practice regulations.

Shanxi Securities Research Institute Contacts:
* Shanghai: 3rd Floor, Block N5, Lujiazui Riverside Center, No. 5159 Binjiang Avenue, Pudong New Area, Shanghai.
* Taiyuan: 28th Floor, Block A, Guomao Center, No. 69 Fu West Street, Taiyuan. Tel: 0351-8686981.
* Shenzhen: 43rd Floor, Dabaihui Plaza, No. 3086 Jintian Road, Futian District, Shenzhen.
* Beijing: 25th Floor, Block A, Lize Ping'an Finance Center, No. 2 Yard, Jinze West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing.
* Website: http://www.i618.com.cn